### Random Post

### Recent Posts

- Enigma 427: Settle some new scores
- Puzzle 59: Cricket
- Enigma 426: Time and again
- Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triangles
- Tantalizer 466: Diplomacy
- Tantalizer 467: Nine men went to mow
- Enigma 1085: Cut and run
- Enigma 425: Them thar’ Hills
- Puzzle 60: Uncle Bungle gets the last line wrong
- Enigma 1086: Stacking trays

### Recent Comments

Jim Randell on Enigma 427: Settle some new… | |

Jim Randell on Enigma 427: Settle some new… | |

geoffrounce on Enigma 1503: Division dec… | |

arthurvause on Enigma 425: Them thar’… | |

Jim Randell on Puzzle 59: Cricket |

### Archives

### Categories

- article (11)
- enigma (1,130)
- misc (2)
- project euler (2)
- puzzle (33)
- site news (43)
- tantalizer (34)
- teaser (3)

### Site Stats

- 170,314 hits

This puzzle requires careful reading to make sure you know what’s going on – I missed a subtlety in my first attempt. I solved this at the time it was published using Perl, but here’s the same approach (but slightly neater) in Python. It runs in 36ms.

Solution:Your correct age is 64.There are two percentage values which give this result: 87% (a 13% reduction) and 88% (a 12% reduction).

I wondered what the subtlety was so I tried it – it a neat twist that I also didn’t see first time round. Here is my version

Much too subtle for me. Nowhere does the puzzle appear to state that a number is reduced twice.

Evidently “whole number” means integer, but I can’t work out what function the word ‘actually’ is performing. Definitely flawed!