### Random Post

### Recent Posts

- Enigma 1096: Prime break
- Enigma 415: Buses galore
- Puzzle 65: Division: figures all wrong
- Enigma 1097: Chessboard triangles
- Enigma 414: Nicely bungled, Sir!
- Tantalizer 473: Pigeon post
- Enigma 1098: Soccer heroes
- Enigma 413: Quargerly dues
- Puzzle 66: Hopes and successes on the island
- Enigma 1099: Unconnected cubes

### Recent Comments

geoffrounce on Enigma 1096: Prime break | |

Brian Gladman on Enigma 1096: Prime break | |

Hugh Casement on Enigma 1096: Prime break | |

Jim Randell on Enigma 1096: Prime break | |

Jim Randell on Enigma 415: Buses galore |

### Archives

### Categories

- article (11)
- enigma (1,107)
- misc (2)
- project euler (2)
- puzzle (27)
- site news (43)
- tantalizer (27)
- teaser (3)

### Site Stats

- 164,475 hits

This puzzle requires careful reading to make sure you know what’s going on – I missed a subtlety in my first attempt. I solved this at the time it was published using Perl, but here’s the same approach (but slightly neater) in Python. It runs in 36ms.

Solution:Your correct age is 64.There are two percentage values which give this result: 87% (a 13% reduction) and 88% (a 12% reduction).

I wondered what the subtlety was so I tried it – it a neat twist that I also didn’t see first time round. Here is my version

Much too subtle for me. Nowhere does the puzzle appear to state that a number is reduced twice.

Evidently “whole number” means integer, but I can’t work out what function the word ‘actually’ is performing. Definitely flawed!