### Random Post

### Recent Posts

### Recent Comments

### Archives

### Categories

- article (11)
- enigma (1,367)
- misc (4)
- project euler (2)
- puzzle (90)
- puzzle# (48)
- site news (58)
- tantalizer (94)
- teaser (7)

### Site Stats

- 233,130 hits

Programming Enigma Puzzles

9 May 2015

Posted by on **From New Scientist #1426, 18th October 1984** [link]

I’ve just been taking to four interesting sisters. I asked the youngest how old she was. She whispered the answer to the tallest sister who whispered the answer to Anita who told me the answer was 53. I was a bit surprised and so I assumed that one of those three must have made a mistake. So I asked the eldest how old she was. She whispered the answer to Barbara who whispered the answer to the shortest who told me the answer was 26! Had these three made a mistake?

Charlotte then explained to me that although all four of them knew their facts and did their calculations correctly, before stating a number they always changed it. One of the sisters always doubled her numbers, one always added 1, one always reversed the digits, and one always squared her numbers and deleted the left-hand digit of that square.

The second eldest sister said she’d help. She asked the eldest and youngest their ages (and the eldest’s answer

wasthe larger of the two) and she calculated the difference and told me what it was: I happened to know that this was also her age.Then the youngest whispered her age to Davina who whispered it to the second tallest who told me.

What number did she tell me?

[enigma279]

%d bloggers like this:

This puzzle is similar to

Enigma 242(also set by Susan Denham), but this version is a bit more involved.I wondered if the statement of the sisters “quirks”, which contains a number, was subject to those quirks, but as it was not a direct quote from one of the sisters I decided not to explore that possibility.

Solution:The number was 312.The only solution is as follows (in age order):

In the first scenario the youngest (C, aged 17), doubles her age to 34 and tells B (the tallest), who adds one to get 35, and tells A, who reverses to get 53. The setter could well be surprised at a 17 year old with a reported age of 53.

In the second scenario the eldest (D, aged 31), squares and truncates her age to give 61 and tells B, who adds one to get 62, and tells A (the shortest) who reverses it to give 26. The setter seems to be unsure if a mistake was made here, and it is easier to accept that a 31 year old could be mistaken for a 26 year old.

Charlotte then explains the situation. Which she either manages to explain without mentioning any numbers (as she would double them before speaking them), or the setter is sufficiently clued up to determine the actual situation and report it to us.

In the third scenario C (the youngest, aged 17) reports her age as 34 to B (2nd eldest), and D (the eldest, aged 31) reports her age as 62 to B. As required the number reported by the eldest is larger than the number reported by the youngest. B then calculates the difference between these two numbers, 27, and reports that as 28 to the setter. Which co-incidentally is B’s actual age.

In the final scenario C (the youngest, aged 17) reports her age as 34 to D, who squares and truncates it and reports it back to C as 156. (Note that in this scenario the setter does not tell us that the sisters involved are all different). C then doubles this to report 312 to the setter.