# Enigmatic Code

Programming Enigma Puzzles

## Enigma 372: Letter by letter

From New Scientist #1521, 14th August 1986 [link]

In this division sum, each letter stands for a different digit.

Rewrite the sum with letters replaced by digits.

[enigma372]

### 8 responses to “Enigma 372: Letter by letter”

1. Jim Randell 25 November 2016 at 8:13 am

We can solve this puzzle using the SubstitutedDivision() solver in the enigma.py library. Here’s the run file:

```#!/usr/bin/env python -m enigma -r

# solver to use
SubstitutedDivision

# the division sum
"bjjhd / fef = aeg"

# the intermediate subtraction sums
"bjj - fef = abh"
"abhh - afhc = cjb"
"cjbd - cjbd = 0"
```

Or we can use the SubstitutedExpression solver (also in the enigma.by library). Here’s the run file for that:

```#!/usr/bin/env python -m enigma -r

# solver to use
SubstitutedExpression

--symbols="abcdefghj"

# the division sum
"fef * aeg = bjjhd"

# the multiples
"a * fef = fef"
"e * fef = afhc"
"g * fef = cjbd"

# the intermediate subtraction sums
"bjj - fef = abh"
"abhh - afhc = cjb"
```

Either way we get the same answer in about the same time (96ms for SubstitutedDivision, 92ms for SubstitutedExpression).

Solution: The sum with numbers substituted for letters is 50078 ÷ 343 = 146:

2. Hugh Casement 25 November 2016 at 8:31 am

Once again I’m moved to say how little imagination is shown by those who set such puzzles with a random jumble of letters.  My favourite in this case is MUM × GIN = BOOZY.  Anyone who finds that sexist or otherwise offensive is welcome to suggest an alternative.

• Brian Gladman 1 December 2016 at 7:54 pm

My complaint about this, Hugh, is not that it is sexist but that it’s not alphametic (good try though!).

• Hugh Casement 2 December 2016 at 7:52 am

Oh, I wonder what went wrong there!  Perhaps my division was faulty.

• Hugh Casement 2 December 2016 at 8:05 am

Does this work?  Last two lines TOBY, top line JUG ?

• Brian Gladman 2 December 2016 at 8:36 am

I am not sure of the change you want to make here, Hugh. I just noticed that mapping MUM x GIN = BOOZY onto 343 x 146 = 50078 makes both U and I equal to 4, which means it is not a (normal) alphametic. I haven’t looked for meaningful words that make this sum correct.

• Hugh Casement 3 December 2016 at 8:22 am

I’m evidently not very good at expressing myself.  Divide MUM into BOOZY to get the quotient JUG.  G × MUM = TOBY, subtracted in the last step to give no remainder.
For equality, no doubt something could be found to fit DAD as divisor.

I now see where the GIN came from.  My pen sputtered when I copied down the puzzle, so that aeg came out as acg.  My word-matching program then did its best, and I didn’t check the arithmetic.  Sorry sorry.

• Jim Randell 2 December 2016 at 8:05 am

The middle letters of MUM and GIN would have to be the same, so “MUM × GUN = BOOZY” which isn’t as satisfying. Maybe “PIP × GIN = BOOZY”.