### Random Post

### Recent Posts

- Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triangles
- Tantalizer 466: Diplomacy
- Tantalizer 467: Nine men went to mow
- Enigma 1085: Cut and run
- Enigma 425: Them thar’ Hills
- Puzzle 60: Uncle Bungle gets the last line wrong
- Enigma 1086: Stacking trays
- Enigma 424: A round of fractions
- Tantalizer 468: Shell fire
- Enigma 1087: Egyptian triangles

### Recent Comments

Jim Randell on Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triang… | |

Brian Gladman on Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triang… | |

Jim Randell on Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triang… | |

geoffrounce on Enigma 1631: Joe’s … | |

geoffrounce on Enigma 1626: Pascal’s… |

### Archives

### Categories

- article (11)
- enigma (1,128)
- misc (2)
- project euler (2)
- puzzle (32)
- site news (43)
- tantalizer (34)
- teaser (3)

### Site Stats

- 169,890 hits

The intermediate multiplications in the sums are given in the opposite order (from top to bottom) than I would normally write them, and also I would normally use blanks to pad the right hand side, rather then zeros. But the form of the sum is clear.

I used the general Alphametic solver (

SubstitutedExpression()) from theenigma.pylibrary to consider the multiplications (ABC × DEF) and (DEF × ABC). The digits ABCDEF are used for the two three-figure numbers and are all different, I use the lower-case lettersabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwto stand for the remaining non-zero digits, withZstanding for zero.This is the run file, which executes in 94.6ms.

Solution:The three-figure numbers are 534 and 216.Here are the two multiplications in full: