Enigma 1106: Not a square unused
17 July 2017
Posted by on
From New Scientist #2262, 28th October 2000
Harry, Tom and I each found a set consisting of a 4-digit perfect square, a 3-digit perfect square and a 2-digit perfect square that between them used nine different digits; but none of us could add a 1-digit square with the unused digit because 9, 4, 1 and 0 all appeared in each of our three sets. No two of us found exactly the same set; none of the squares in my set appeared in either Harry’s set or Tom’s set. There is one further set that none of us found whose unused digit is again not itself a perfect square.
List in ascending order the three squares in this set that none of us found.