Enigma 1030: Uncommonly different progressions
28 December 2018
Posted by on
From New Scientist #2186, 15th May 1999 [link]
Certain 5-digit perfect squares can be formed by coupling a pair of smaller squares: a 1-digit square followed by a 4-digit square, or a 2-digit square followed by a 3-digit square, or a 4-digit square followed by a 1-digit square. A leading zero in front of the second square makes it ineligible; that means that 64009 can only be regarded as 80² followed by 3² (not at 8² followed by 3²) and squares such as 10000 are eliminated — so don’t waste time looking for a 3-digit square followed by a 2-digit square; it should be obvious that no such 5-digit square can exist.
Harry, Tom and I each chose three eligible 5-digit squares, and on each of our squares we multiplied the square roots of the pair of coupled smaller squares. We each found that our three products could be arranged to form an arithmetic progression; in addition the common difference of our three progressions could themselves be arranged to form another arithmetic progression whose common difference was different from that of any of the three previous progressions.
1. List in ascending order those 5-digit squares that were chosen by just one of us.
2. List in ascending order those eligible 5-digit squares that none of us chose.