Tantalizer 3: Café de Gaulle
From New Scientist #552, 6th July 1967 [link]
My friend Jones has food poisoning, which serves him right. Last night he thought he would impress two girls by taking them to dinner at the newly opened Café de Gaulle. Since the girls have survived the ordeal, we may assume that the trouble lay in a dish which Jones ate and they did not.
The menu was this:
Potage Tiede … 1s
Haricots sur Toast … 2s
Coctaile de Crevettes … 3s
Bulle et Couic … 4s
Crapeau dans le Trou … 5s
Trotteurs de Cochon … 6s
Fromage Souriciere … 2s
Morceau Singulier Gallois … 3s
Becasse Ecossaise … 4s
Jones tells me that each of them ate one item from each course and that, not counting tips etc., he paid eight shillings for himself, nine shillings for Polly and 10s for Gladys. No dish eaten by Polly was also eaten by Gladys.
He was in fact able to recall what the girls had eaten and so even though he had forgotten what he ate himself, we could deduce what had poisoned him. The offending dish can, however, be deduced merely from the information given so far plus the information that someone had Becasse Ecossaise.
Which is it?
In the book Tantalizers (1970) a reworded version of this puzzle appears under the title: “Café des Gourmets”.
See also: Enigma 236.
This Python program constructs possible meals (one dish from each course) by price, and then allocates appropriate meals to each of the three participants, such that P and G has no dish in common, and there is a single candidate poisonous dish that is eaten by J alone.
We then look for situations where if we knew which dishes were eaten by P and G (although not necessarily who ate what), we could deduce the poisoned dish. From these candidates we select those that include the dish BE.
This Python program runs in 64ms. (Internal runtime is 470µs).
Run: [ @replit ]
Solution: The poison dish was: Fromage Souriciere.
We have the following possible orders:
The dishes are (thanks to Hugh Casement for the translations):