### Random Post

### Recent Posts

- Enigma 426: Time and again
- Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triangles
- Tantalizer 466: Diplomacy
- Tantalizer 467: Nine men went to mow
- Enigma 1085: Cut and run
- Enigma 425: Them thar’ Hills
- Puzzle 60: Uncle Bungle gets the last line wrong
- Enigma 1086: Stacking trays
- Enigma 424: A round of fractions
- Tantalizer 468: Shell fire

### Recent Comments

Brian Gladman on Enigma 426: Time and agai… | |

Jim Randell on Enigma 426: Time and agai… | |

Jim Randell on Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triang… | |

Brian Gladman on Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triang… | |

Jim Randell on Enigma 1084: 1-2-3 triang… |

### Archives

### Categories

- article (11)
- enigma (1,129)
- misc (2)
- project euler (2)
- puzzle (32)
- site news (43)
- tantalizer (34)
- teaser (3)

### Site Stats

- 169,972 hits

A bit of analysis tells us in which part of the table the errors must lie, and this Python program does the rest. It’s a bit messy, but it runs in 71ms.

Solution:The scores in Arnsley’s four games were – Arnsley vs. Boldham: 0 – 2; Arnsley vs. Cleeds: 0 – 0; Arnsley vs. Drochdale: 1 – 0; Arnsley vs. Erby: 1 – 0.The incorrect values are the “won”, “drawn” and “lost” values for Boldham.