**From New Scientist #2154, 3rd October 1998**

To celebrate next week’s 1000th edition of *Enigma*, we each made up an Enigma. Each one consisted of four clues leading to its own unique positive whole number answer. In each case none of the four clues was redundant. To avoid duplication, Keith made up his Enigma first and showed it to Susan before she made up hers.

The two Enigmas were meant to be printed side-by-side but the publishers have made a (rare) error and printed the clues in a string:

(A) It is a three-figure number;

(B) It is less than a thousand;

(C) It is a perfect square;

(D) It is a perfect cube;

(E) It has no repeated digits;

(F) The sum of its digits is a perfect square;

(G) The sum of its digits is a perfect cube;

(H) The sum of all the digits which are odd in Keith’s answer is the same as the sum of all the digits which are odd in Susan’s.

Which four clues should have formed Keith’s Enigma, and what was the answer to Susan’s?

There are now 1300 *Enigma* puzzles available on the site (or at least 1300 posts in the *enigma* category). There are 492 *Enigma* puzzles remaining to post.

There are currently also 76 puzzles from the *Tantalizer* series, 75 from the *Puzzle* series and 13 from the new *Puzzle #* series of puzzles that have been published in *New Scientist* which together cover puzzles from 1975 to 2019 (albeit with some gaps).

I also notice that the **enigma.py** library is now 10 years old (according to the header in the file – the creation date given coincides with me buying a book on *Python*). In those 10 years it has grown considerably, in both functionality and size. I’m considering doing a few articles focussed on specific functionality that is available in the library.

[enigma999]

### Like this:

Like Loading...

## Recent Comments